College Football, Florida Gators, Recruiting

Cormani McClain spurns the Gators
Billy Napier whiffs in a big way with his biggest recruit thus far

Cormani McClain commits to Billy Napier

Cormani McClain spurns the Gators

Embed from Getty Images

Even if Billy Napier’s Gator team loses by 50 this weekend against Georgia, that won’t be a worse loss than when Cormani McClain shocked Napier and the entire recruiting industry by committing to the Miami Hurricanes.

As someone who absolutely hates Georgia, I don’t say that lightly. But a loss to the Bulldogs is a one-time event that says very little about long-term, sustained excellence. Missing out on a player of McClain’s ilk is all about grasping – and coming up short – of long-term, sustained excellence.

Advertisements

I wrote earlier this week about the first year struggles of both Nick Saban and Kirby Smart before they built their dynasties. Saban went 7-6 in year one while Smart went 8-5. But one of the key things I found when looking at those seasons was that Saban went 4-6 in one-score games while Smart went 6-3. Both of them combined for two blowout (20-plus point) wins in those seasons.

That completely flipped in year two for both of them, with the two teams combining for 17 blowout wins. What changed? Jake Fromm and Julio Jones.

Obviously those players weren’t the only guys making a difference on those teams, but Jones came in and caught 58 balls as a true freshman in 2008. Fromm came in for an injured Jacob Eason and threw for more than 2600 yards and 9.0 yards per attempt.

They were both important parts of each coaches’ bump class.

What is a bump class?

Bill Sikes familiarized me with the term “bump class” years ago. Bill’s explanation is a great one, which is that since recruiting is based on relationships, it’s hard to really recruit truly elite players when you’re behind the eight ball right after you’re hired.

But in the second recruiting class, you have plenty of time to build relationships and an extra added advantage. There isn’t anything your opponents can say about you that they can actually prove.

If someone wants to say Billy Napier can’t win in the SEC, go ahead. There isn’t any evidence of that. If they want to say he’s not going to be able to build Florida into a power again, they’re free to do so. But again, they’re projecting just like any recruit is going to be.

That means that Napier gets to sell his vision without any interference from wins and losses, at least as the relationship is starting. Additionally, I’ve looked at in-season performance and whether it correlates to recruiting quality and I’m not convinced that recruits care all that much about what the product on the field looks like prior to arriving (clearly that’s the case with McClain after Miami’s ugly loss to Duke just last week).

They’re committing to a coach and his vision.

What that means is that a bump class is truly a measure of whether a coach is going to be able to recruit at an elite level. Saban had the third ranked class nationally for his bump class. So did Smart. I already mentioned names like Fromm and Jones, but those classes also included D’Andre Swift, Richard LeCounte, Isaiah Wilson, Andrew Thomas, Mark Barron, Courtney Upshaw, Mark Ingram, Marcell Dareus, Dont’a Hightower and Terrance Cody.

That’s a boatload of talent.

So that leads to the obvious question: what does missing on McClain mean and where does Napier’s bump class stand?

Comps for Napier

Without McClain, Florida’s 247Sports point total stays at 270.92, but drops them to 9th nationally as the Hurricanes have jumped them in the overall rankings. It also keeps the Gators a solid 4th in the SEC rather than nipping right at the heels of LSU for 3rd. The Gators also have an average playing rating of 91.72.

This is important because recruiting these days is really about tiers. Tier 1 consists of Georgia (average player rating of 93.28), Alabama (94.10) and Ohio State (93.33). Tier 2 consists of Notre Dame (92.89), Oklahoma (92.23), Texas (92.26), LSU (92.27) and now Miami (92.49).

Florida (91.72) is in a third tier with Clemson (91.73), Oregon (90.85), Tennessee (90.62), Penn State (91.18) and USC (91.06). Those programs are not slouches, but being in the third tier of recruiting and fourth in the conference isn’t good enough for the sustained excellence that Scott Stricklin said he wanted when he let Dan Mullen go.

I know that those differences in point totals don’t sound all that significant, but they really are. Dan Mullen’s recruiting classes were all pretty much between 90.1 and 90.7 in his four years at Florida, and while Mullen fielded some good teams, he never fielded an elite one.

If we compare Napier to former Florida coaches, we start to see the problem.

Napier recruiting vs Muschamp, McElwain, Mullen and Meyer

I’ve written repeatedly about how players at the top of the rankings get drafted significantly more often. Because of that, I like dividing up recruits into Zone 1 players (ranked 1-60), Zone 2 players (ranked 61-200) and Zone 3 players (ranked 201-600) instead of blue chips or 5, 4 and 3-star rankings.

The result is that you can get an idea of how many players we should expect to be drafted from a given class. Since a team is made up of 22 players, you have an elite roster if you can average 5.5 draftable players per recruiting class.

Napier’s bump class just isn’t that much better than either Mullen or McElwain at this point. He has a ton of players in Zones 2 and 3 but zero top-end talent. Even with McClain in the fold that would have been true, but the number two player in the country is a different kind of deal as we’ll discuss in a minute.

The result is that as currently constituted, this class sits right where Jim McElwain was at in 2016 and just slightly in front of Dan Mullen in 2019 in terms of expected players drafted. Not exactly what we want to hear at this late stage of recruiting.

To be certain, there are still players on Florida’s board. Keon Keeley (7th nationally), Desmond Ricks (15th), James Smith (16th) and Qua Russaw (30th) are possibilities, as is OT Samson Okunlola (18th). But the only way Napier is matching what Meyer, Saban or Smart did in their bump classes is by signing four of those five. Considering that McClain was the sure thing, it’s hard to have confidence that outcome is in the cards.

I mentioned Smart and Saban and here’s how Napier’s class stacks up to their bump classes, along with that of Urban Meyer at Florida.

Napier recruiting vs Saban, Smart and Meyer

Again, we can see that Napier is way behind the pace. The hope was with McClain in the fold that he could sign two more of those players listed above and get close to Saban and Smart. But at this point, that’s pretty much out the window.

McClain can be truly special

Lost in all of these rankings is the fact that players ranked as high as McClain almost always get drafted and become major impact players in college football.

I group him together with players ranked 30th or 55th because I have to draw the line somewhere and that’s really where the likeliness of being drafted starts to level out, but that likeliness drops precipitously just going from the number one ranked player to the 15th ranked player.

McClain is the second ranked player in the entire country. Here are some recent players to occupy that prestigious slot.

  • 2016 – Dexter Lawrence, Clemson (1st round NFL draft pick, 17th overall)
  • 2017 – Najee Harris, Alabama (1st round NFL draft pick, 24th overall)
  • 2018 – Justin Fields, Georgia/Ohio State (1st round NFL draft pick, 11th overall)
  • 2019 – Kayvon Thibodeaux, Oregon (1st round NFL draft pick, 5th overall)
  • 2020 – Bryce Young, Alabama (Heisman Trophy Winner)

In fact, the last player ranked second to not really work out (and that’s not completely fair because he did end up being awarded freshman All-SEC and twice All-SEC second team honors) was Martez Ivey from the 2015 class.

So that’s your absolute floor for McClain: freshman All-SEC honors and a 2-time second team All-SEC performer. You can keep going back further if you want and the story is the same: Myles Garrett (1st overall pick), Jaylon Smith (2nd round, 34th overall due to injury), Mario Edwards (2nd round, 35th overall), and Cyrus Kouandjio (2nd round, 44th overall).

If we just sub in another 5-star – the 18th ranked Okunlola, for example – there is a lot more variability.

  • 2016 – Jeffery Simmons, Mississippi State (1st round, 19th overall)
  • 2017 – Jacoby Stevens, LSU (6th round, 224th overall)
  • 2018 – Adam Anderson, UGA (13.5 sacks, rape charge)
  • 2019 – Brandon Smith, Penn State (4th round, 120th overall pick)
  • 2020 – Jalen Carter, UGA (future NFL first round pick)

These are still really, really good players. But the variance in outcome that we see has already become much more significant than it was at the second spot. McClain was essentially a player guaranteed to be drafted. To get the same level of guarantee, Florida needs to sign Okunlola and Russaw.

Takeaway

When David Waters asked Dan Mullen a recruiting question last year following the 34-7 shellacking from the Bulldogs and Mullen responded with a non-answer, it was the beginning of the end for Mullen.

That set the stage for the entrance of Billy Napier, who had to prove to the fan base that he both understands how important recruiting is and can execute on his plan to get Florida back to prominence. He clearly expressed an understanding at his press conference, as he immediately called college football “a talent acquisition business.”

But when signing day came last February and Napier missed on Harold Perkins (who has 36 tackles and 2.5 sacks for LSU), Jacoby Mathews and Trevonte’ Citizen, it caused some worry. For sure, it didn’t spell doom and gloom but it meant that he had failed to answer THE question that everyone knows will define his tenure here: can he land the recruiting classes necessary to win big.

McClain’s decision to go to Miami leaves that a gaping, open question. And in some ways, that’s a generous assessment. There’s no doubt that recruiting is better than it was under Dan Mullen, but Florida fans didn’t want better than Dan Mullen. They wanted better than Kirby Smart.

I’m not sure there’s any way to sit here with a straight face and say that Napier has given us confidence that he’s going to be able to get there at this point. McClain’s commitment is a signal. He was the number one priority recruit for this staff ever since it arrived. He is from Lakeland, Florida. Getting him may not have answered the recruiting question completely, but missing on him just takes any air out of the balloon that Napier has been building as many very good recruits have picked Florida over the summer.

The state of Florida was leaky when Napier arrived, surrendering elite players to Alabama, Georgia, Clemson and Ohio State on a way too regular basis. McClain’s decision to go elsewhere in Florida may mean that those leaks are starting to get sealed off, but the fact that they’re being sealed by Mario Cristobal and not Napier is a big problem for the Gators.

To be sure, the Gators have 10 players in the top-235 nationally who hail from the state of Florida. But none of the best 15 players and only two of the top-25 players in the state are coming to Gainesville. Conversely, 3 of the top-15 players and 5 of the top-25 (with a sixth possible in Rueben Bain) are going to Miami.

Folks are going to point to NIL and rumored payments that may have enticed McClain to change his mind and pick the Hurricanes. But here’s the thing: that doesn’t really matter.

NIL is here to stay and Florida has to compete in that landscape. It isn’t immoral for a player to maximize his earning while going to a college that is going to reap the benefits of his labor. In fact, you could make the argument that the old way was much worse from a morality standpoint.

Advertisements

And regardless, it is Napier’s job to acquire talent within the rules that exist. This isn’t little league where everybody gets a participation trophy. You’re getting $7 million a year and have a staff of approximately 35,000 people to ensure players like Cormani McClain come to Florida.

Napier whiffed and there’s no other way to spin this. I suspect there may still be an opportunity to flip McClain at some point along the way, but that’s what it’s going to take to have a successful bump class.

Because just like Napier said, this is a talent acquisition business.

November Sweepstakes

My friend Dan reached out to me about having a little bit of fun the rest of the season and has graciously donated the prize. The Gators schedule – especially now that Texas A&M is imploding – is a lot easier than what we saw in September and October. So will the Gators bounce back in November?

Enter the November Sweepstakes HERE and enter for a chance to win 2 tickets to a Gators home basketball game (you can pick any game other than Kentucky).

11 Comments

  1. Gator Brian

    Excellent read. Always enjoy the analysis. I agree with everything except the ethical analysis. The ethics claim is a MUCH bigger issue than can be addressed here, and I suggest it is more complex. One concern I have, and I don’t hear this discussed enough, is the idea of amateurism in relation to NIL (hence the NCAA). With NIL, it seems the notion of amateurism is now gone. Of course, there is a long history here, and ethical twists and turns to it. However, we spin it, NIL is the death of amateurism–or whatever amateurism was left, if there was still any to begin with. And if there is some ethical component or ethical value to the ideal of amateurism, then that ideal is now dead. This is what bothers me. Call me a purist, but I believe there is a moral component of amateurism that was part of college football but with NIL is now severely damaged. A case can be made for that, too. A bigger issue no doubt, but I felt some pushback was warranted.

    At any rate, good analysis of this disappointing night for Gators.

    • BCNGator

      Dude, amateurism has been dead for at least 40 years and possibly even longer. Is it more or less ethical to pay players under the table instead of out in the open? Do you really think the amazing athletes we’ve had since the 1980’s were just local guys using football to pay for school?

      Yes I myself sometimes pine for the days when the team was made up of earnest hardworking guys that genuinely loved UF and just wanted a degree. Here’s the thing, no one wants to watch that. There’s club teams at UF RIGHT NOW made up completely of guys like I just described. How many people watch them play? Zero. Conversely, how many people have tuned in to watch college football since the 80’s and on? The ratings are massive, and I strongly suspect that you yourself are among them.

      • Gator Brian

        We both think amateurism is dead; we differ over when that death occurred. I acknowledge the difficulty of this question in my comments above. I would like to believe, perhaps naïvely, that this only happened recently with NIL. Maybe I’m wrong—you certainly think so.

        My point was that there are ethical ideals that amateurism promotes, even the pre NIL NCAA college football version, and if there was any of this left (if any at all) then NIL seems to have killed it. There is a moral claim to be made for pushing back against the current state of things. That was my point when I commented on WM’s aside in the article. We have a different point of view on this. I think WM does too. I am definitely in the minority here.

        If amateurism died forty years ago as you claim and I have been enjoying and supporting the Florida Gators during that time (since 1992, mind you), then you’re right: I have been complicit in supporting a thing I oppose, namely, the professionalisation of college sports. Maybe it is time to think about stepping away from supporting the Gators and the entire system as it is. I’m wrestling with it.

        If college football really is now just a minor league professional sport just let it be so. I guess it’s now gone this way. I’m tired of people ducking and diving this question (I don’t think you are, btw). It has been laughable to listen to sports writers and journalists attempt to wrestle with the moral aspect of NIL. I find it extremely frustrating. It is not enough to give some generic support of capitalism or the American way etc etc and present this as a moral claim. This is where I’m coming from and why I think WM’s comment struck this nerve.

  2. Brian

    Will – love your work. Keep it up. My question is this, if this is a Napier whiff, how so ? I agree NIL is a reality and not an excuse, but logistically, how can the coach affect that? We don’t know if NIL was a factor, but if it was, what can the coach due to influence that aspect?

    • I agree! Yes, I understand the logic behind Will’s assessment as to how much losing McCain hurts the overall numbers at this point. I also agree with the idea you “can’t cry over spilled milk.” The elephant in the room is NIL and what MAY have occured with another school today. I don’t think anything Napier did or didn’t do along with staff impacted the recruits decision. I DO think for the future, NIL money or the lack off needs to be addressed, or this will play itself out again and again. FWIW, the recruit apparently told everybody including his HS coach that he was going to Florida….and then this happened. Maybe Florida might be better off in the long run without him.

      • Tiffany

        Thanks for the harsh but honest commentary, Will. I fear this will be a tough weekend for Gators fans. Lose out on a top player who was, by all accounts, ours to lose, and then a likely shellacking by UGA. Praying for some sort of silver lining tomorrow.

        Also, I second everything Greg said

  3. We fired Mullen because he couldn’t recruit, and we may have gotten better average players but not much better rankings. We insisted on getting rid of third and Grantham, we ended up last on third down defense (Grantham needs an apology). We were angry that Mullen wouldn’t play the best players, only to spend the first half of the season with a sub-par running back starting and a kick returner that obviously wasn’t the best on the team. It seems we just hired Mullen 2.0, slightly better at some statistics but not nearly the same quality of a game coach (when Mullen really tried). Mullen had to go, but we didn’t really get any better. So sad.

    • Nostradamus

      Comparing year one of Napier to year 4 of Mullen/Grantham is apples to oranges.

      Toney ran an excellent defense at UL and Napier had that program ranked in the top 20 and Conf champions by the time he left.

      As for not playing the best players, that’s somewhat subjective. Napier has always said he’ll play the guys he can trust the most. Wright at RB is not as good as Etienne or Johnson, but he’s very trustworthy – he plays very sound and disciplined football and doesn’t turn the ball over. As for Henderson taking kick offs, Napier wanted someone who could catch more than someone who could return at the outset of the season.

      If you look at things thru the trust lens, the Napier is doing exactly what he said he’d do with playing time.

      As for Toney’s D, I agree that it’s a train wreck – esp on 3rd down, but I’ll wait a year or two to see the finished product. He’s a young DC who had success in the minor league, and is now in the major league. Will he be able to step up? I think so, but he’s also going to get his lunch money stolen from time to time while he comes up the learning curve. Only other option is to grab a seasoned top level DC like Geoff Collins, and that would be a rather hasty move at this point IMO.

  4. John gibbons

    Will, as always well written perspectives on the recruiting trail, although many points are redundant from your previous articles.

    I take issue with the “CBN whiffed” on this recruit. How? The NIL? If CBN and staff mishandled the recruiting of this prospect is one thing, how? The assumption today is it was NIL $. Is that a fact? Let’s assume it’s why he chose UM, is so, it’s a violation of the guidelines. For the sake of argument, let’s say UM doesn’t care, they got their guy.

    So CBN whiffed because possibly we did not match the UM NIL? Are you aware of the power and authority of the UF Athletics Compliance Office? Here’s the deal, you cheat and you’re fired, see Coach Charlie Pell, and his predecessor Galen Hall. The strict nature of this group ensures the University will not be embarrassed again. And when I say strict, think microscopic. Scott Strickland spoke 2 weeks ago on the Pat Dooley podcast about the NIL dilemma and guidelines, I encourage everyone to watch or listen, it’s instructive what the marching orders are to the various programs regarding the use of the NIL in recruiting.

    From my perspective CBN did not whiff, they went after this guy hard; UM won for whatever reason. Failure is defined as not making the effort or attempt to reach an objective, so says the great Michael Jordan. The context was taking the last second shot for the win. His point, keep shooting and accept you’re not going to make them all….you will make enough to win though more often than not.

    And yes, paying players has been around forever. Now it’s out in the open to some degree with the NIL. The past preferred method was have a group of alums or fans surround a player with support. The support team had a captain who the player called whe he needed something. This system was utilized by national championship teams in the last half of the 20th century. How do I know? A close friend, who was assistant head coach, answered this question at breakfast- how do you guys consistently recruit top 5 classes and hold onto them? $$$$

    That’s the ugly truth regarding the underside of the ncaa model..

    I’m proud UF draws a line in the sand and holds coaches accountable!

    Go Gators!

    • Gary Keith

      I generally agree that he didn’t whiff. From what I understand, UF had no idea that this player would command such a signing bonus, nor the amount of $ over the years. In fact, there wouldn’t be an example of these numbers for a corner anywhere. I think the bigger question here is how is UF going to adjust to this going forward. They wasted months on recruiting a guy and had they known the Miami numbers, they would never have gone down that road. I think they would have passed.

  5. Gary Keith

    Not sure what Napier and crew could have done different here. They weren’t going to pay him anywhere close to what he’s getting from Miami. Nor was anyone else.