College Football, Florida Gators

Vanderbilt shocks Florida
Is this the beginning or beginning of the end for Billy Napier?

Florida Gators head coach Billy Napier vs. Vanderbilt

Vanderbilt shocks Florida

Embed from Getty Images

To say that it was shocking to see Florida lose to Vanderbilt is an understatement. By every available statistic, Vanderbilt has been an inferior team this season.

But when you just hand points over to the opposition in the SEC, you can lose to anyone, even Vanderbilt. But that’s a problem for Billy Napier, because Florida doesn’t lose to Vanderbilt.

Advertisements

The last time it happened (2013), Florida QB Tyler Murphy threw the ball 46 times. Perhaps then, it shouldn’t be a surprise that in Vandy’s next win in the series, Anthony Richardson would throw the ball 43 times.

All of which brings things back to Napier. As a first year head coach, he needs to get some grace as the program goes through growing pains. But all of the goodwill built over the past two weeks with wins over Texas A&M and South Carolina is gone.

You can say a lot of things about this game, but the one that sticks with me is this. When you look at the schedule during the preseason, fans and analysts put the Vanderbilt game in the win category. That’s understandable given the history and given the stats thus far.

But what it looked like on Saturday was that the Florida staff put this one in the win category too. So you can blame the players for a lot of mistakes – and we’ll get to that – but this one falls on Napier.

Because Florida shouldn’t lose to Vanderbilt.

Mistakes, mistakes and more mistakes

There were a ton of mistakes that Florida made on Saturday, but there are three in particular that I want to highlight given the way the game turned out.

The first play is the Gators defense. The offense had just come out and driven down the field to start the second half, drawing the score to 14-12. Florida force a third-and-14 and had the opportunity to get the ball back to its offense. Instead, this happened.

Florida defensive coordinator Patrick Toney decided to bring pressure, rushing six defenders. It worked perfectly, as both Princely Umanmielen (#33) and Antwaun Powell-Ryland (#52) win their one-on-one battles and force Vandy QB Mike Wright to throw the ball away.

The blitz left Florida linebacker Amari Burney (#2) in one-on-one coverage against the Vanderbilt tight end. Burney immediately ties him up as he goes out and then doesn’t let go. You can see when Wright throws the ball away, Burney and the tight end are only 2-3 yards past the line of scrimmage. Even if Burney had been beat, it wouldn’t have been a first down.

This is just focus. The whole point of bringing six rushers is to make the QB get rid of the ball quickly. You don’t care if he makes the completion. You just care that the play stays in front of you. Had Burney pulled down a receiver going deep, that’s one thing. But to hold a tight end on a third-and-14 when you know the QB is going to get heat is just bad.

The second play I’ll highlight so far as mistakes is on the offensive side of the ball. Florida was behind 7-3 and was starting to get a little bit of a push up-front. It was time to announce they were going to push Vanderbilt around.

That happened on this play except that the Gators didn’t line up properly. Based on the formation, I suspect Thai Chiaokhiao-Bowman is supposed to be up on the line of scrimmage. I realize he hasn’t gotten a lot of snaps this season, but this is first day install-type stuff. You have to have seven guys on the line and he isn’t even close.

This 27-yard run for Montrell Johnson took the ball to the 4-yard line. The illegal formation penalty had nothing to do with why the play was successful. Most likely, Florida would have converted this into a touchdown. Instead, they settled for a field goal.

The third play I’ll highlight has to do with special teams. I know you think I’m going to show the muffed punt, but that actually isn’t the one I’d point to in terms of preparation.

Point after attempts are the easiest points in football. Everything was perfect here for Mihalek. The snap was perfect, and the hold was perfect too. He just yanked it waaaaaay left. He’s now 12-18 on field goals, which isn’t really that good. But Billy Napier needs to be able to trust his kicker to make sound decisions and right now, I can’t say that he should have much faith in Mihalek.

These are just the three that I picked from. The list of mistakes is really long and sickening.

  • Poor snap on opening drive, loss of 18
  • Montrell Johnson drops easy TD catch on third-and-8 (-4 points)
  • Umanmielen unnecessary roughness penalty after stop on third-and-8 (-7 points)
  • Facemask on Powell-Ryland after sack on third-and-12 (same drive as previous)
  • 27 yard run for Johnson called back on illegal formation (-4 points)
  • Dropped pick-6 by Kamari Wilson (-7 points)
  • Muffed punt recovered for TD (-7 points)
  • 15-yard run for Johnson with 3:22 left, 15 yard unnecessary roughness on Eguakun
  • Holding on Burney on third-and-14 stop (-7 points)
  • Richardson INT, followed by awful tackling on TD to Bresnahan (-4 points)
  • Targeting on Ventrell Miller
  • Reynolds dropped perfect TD pass with 3:22 left, catches another 9 seconds later
  • Missed PAT (-1)
  • Shorter catches the ball short of the first down, clock should have run out
  • Richardson throws hail mary out of the end zone

Certainly Vanderbilt caused some of these. But a lot of them are self-inflicted wounds. That’s particularly true of the illegal formation and the two unnecessary roughness penalties. The potential Wilson pick-6 is a tough play, but it’s one that could have been made and turned the tide.

All told, Florida had an opportunity to flip the ledger by 41 points in a seven-point loss. Had they made just a few of those plays, they would have escaped Nashville with a win. Instead, it’s going to be a long plane ride home.

Anthony Richardson

If you had gone on Twitter after the game, you would have thought that Anthony Richardson cost Florida this game. I’m completely floored at that reaction.

Richardson made mistakes in this game just like everyone else. His interception should have never been thrown. He should probably see Chiaokhiao-Bowman off the line of scrimmage and get him aligned. But he’s also the only reason Florida was anywhere close in this game.

The man threw for 400 yards with a 9.5 yards per throw average. He averaged 6.3 yards per rush. His QB rating of 158.3 is his highest against anyone save Eastern Washington all year. His Yards Above Replacement (YAR) – my proprietary QB stat that takes running and throwing into account – has him at 1.75 for the game, or good but not quite elite.

Was he feast or famine? Absolutely. But he’s been that way all year long. Had he played this way and had the running game been even average, Florida scored 40 points easily. But he got zero help from the running game and Florida had to rely on his arm.

For the game, Florida’s offense averaged 7.0 yards per play. That’s a little bit misleading because they had six explosive plays and if you subtract those from the ledger, the Gators only averaged 3.9 yards per play. But that has been a consistent theme of this Florida offense all season: explosive but inconsistent otherwise.

You can certainly put some of that on Richardson, but very few of those mistakes I listed above are on him. He played well against the Commodores.

You can’t say that about many of his teammates.

Billy Napier

If you’re going to criticize Napier for something in this game, I think it’s this.

After Umanmielen got an unnecessary roughness penalty for retaliating against a Vanderbilt offensive lineman on a third down stop, he remained in the game for the next play. After Chiaokhiao-Bowman was lined-up improperly on the Montrell Johnson run, he remained in the game for the next play. And after Kingsley Eguakun got a personal foul for a completely unnecessary hit after a 15-yard run by Johnson, Eguakun remained in the game for the next play.

None of those errors rises to the level of a shoe throw, but if you’re not going to hold your guys accountable for dumb mistakes, those dumb mistakes are going to continue to happen.

I hear a lot of noise about Napier’s play calling. Specifically, the criticism seems to be that he isn’t being aggressive enough. I don’t think that’s the case.

Last week against South Carolina, Richardson had a 56 percent usage rate (Montrell Johnson plus Trevor Etienne were at 40%). Against Texas A&M, that number was 46 percent (Johnson plus Etienne were 52%). But against Vanderbilt, Richardson had a 71 percent usage rate, compared to 30 percent for Johnson and Etienne.

Florida (and Napier) forgot who they are.

A prime example of that was after Vanderbilt scored to extend its lead to 21-12. On the first play of the drive, Florida took a deep shot and nearly hit.

This was almost a huge play for Florida. The ball hit Shorter in the hands but the defender was able to swipe it away. But look at Vanderbilt’s pre-snap alignment. They have six defenders in the box to Florida’s six blockers. It has two safeties parallel to each other 11-yard deep, screaming zone coverage. This is the kind of look you want to run against.

Instead, Florida doesn’t even fake the run. This was a pass from the start and Richardson is one of a few players with the arm to make this throw. It could have been a big play, but it isn’t the way Florida has moved the ball all season long.

This is a team that has run the ball on third-and-long multiple times all season but somehow ended up with a 2:1 ratio of passes to runs.

Still, I have a hard time blaming Napier for all of this. I mean, what is he supposed to do about this?

Florida caught Vanderbilt in a blitz. Richardson delivered the ball perfectly. Vanderbilt is in man-to-man, which means nobody picks up Johnson and he has an open run for a TD and at minimum, a first down. Instead, he drops it and the Gators settle for a field goal.

Takeaway

I get that fans want to blame someone for a loss to Vanderbilt. Certainly Napier gets a lot of the blame here because this is his team and his program now. And hearing Dan Mullen snicker about the Gators losing to Vanderbilt on the SEC Network in the evening definitely rubbed salt in the wounds.

But seeing the grin on Mullen’s face was a bit much for me. He’s the real reason that Florida is in this state. Napier may have screwed up some things in this game, but the bulk of the problems occurring on the field are because of the players that he brought in.

Should Napier have had his team better prepared? Absolutely. Should he have stuck with the run early instead of abandoning it for the pass? Yes. Should he have yanked his guys off the field after stupid penalties? I think the answer there is yes as well.

You can’t lose to Vanderbilt and escape culpability. There’s no doubt that it is an embarrassing loss, but in the grand scheme of things, this loss isn’t going to make or break the Napier era.

After a loss like this, I’m sure you’ll hear about the loss that Nick Saban had to Louisiana-Monroe or the loss Kirby Smart had to Vanderbilt in their first years. It is absolutely true that elite coaches struggle in their first year.

But if you’re going to cite those examples, then you also need to talk about Mullen’s embarrassing loss to Missouri in 2018. Or Tennessee’s Butch Jones losing to Vanderbilt in 2013. Or Nebraska’s Scott Frost losing to Troy in 2018.

The point is twofold. First, you can’t just look at poor results in year one and excuse them because someone elite had poor results as well. It has to be part of building something bigger.

Both Saban and Smart brought in the 3rd best recruiting class nationally right after their first season, but perhaps more importantly, they were ranked 2nd in the SEC. Mullen brought in the 9th ranked class (5th in the SEC). Jones brought in the 7th ranked class (4th in the SEC). And Frost brought in the 17th ranked class (4th in the Big Ten).

Right now, Billy Napier has the 8th ranked recruiting class nationally. That puts him at 4th in the SEC. He’s not going to catch Alabama or Georgia, but a big close will put him on-par with LSU. That is way more important to the health of the program than this loss.

But won’t a loss like this impact recruiting in a negative way? Luckily, I’ve looked at how on-field performance correlates with recruiting in the past and it doesn’t look like it does all that much. The story seems to be that whatever level a coach is recruiting at in August is going to carry through to signing day, regardless of performance.

Advertisements

Of course, none of that makes this any better. Florida didn’t lose this game because it has less talented players. They came in with a sub-standard game plan, sub-standard execution and sub-standard effort.

With just an average performance against Vanderbilt, Florida would be preparing to try to go 8-4 against a huge rival with fans feeling like the program is about to turn the corner. Instead, we’re left getting trolled by Florida State for the next week without any real response.

The narrative of the program has completely flipped with this one loss. Boosters are upset. Fans are apoplectic. And confidence in Napier is at an all-time low. I have people asking whether this is just the low point of the rebuild or if it’s the beginning of the end for Napier.

The short answer is that winning cures all ills. Win against the ‘Noles and confidence in the coach and direction of the program will return. But in reality, the result of next week’s game will have very little bearing on the direction of the program just as this loss to Vanderbilt has very little bearing as well. There’s only one real way to make sure the ship is pointed in the right direction long-term.

Recruit.

18 Comments

  1. Andrew

    I’ve really enjoyed your articles this season. Generally they’re well-reasoned and internally consistent, with great clips and analysis. I think this one is a surprising overreaction with some sizeable flaws in logic.

    Your subtitle goes defcon 1 with this possibly being the end of Napier. Yet I don’t see how your three video examples and the majority of your bulleted list are coaching problems. Do you seriously think Napier was looking past this game? Do you think he was encouraging a lackadaisical attitude that might have led to absurd penalties, dropped passes, and that muffed punt? Is Napier why AR threw an uncatchable ball on the last play? For whatever reason, teams can struggle when you don’t expect it. Maybe you think it was coaching more than the cold or the 11 am road game or Vandy playing substantially better that you think they should. Parsing that is hard, and you say as much in your article.

    Have you looked around college football lately? How do you explain Kentucky losing to Vandy last week, or South Carolina thumping Tennessee today? TCU barely beat Baylor. Unranked Arkansas beat ranked Ole Miss. Both ranked North Carolina schools lost to unranked teams. #3 Michigan needed a last minute field goal to beat unranked Illinois 19-17. What exactly do you expect from first-year Napier when you see all this chaos?

    The truth is you can’t explain why Gators were dropping passes, or Powell-Ryland caught that facemask on the would-be sack, or why Kamari (0.98 rated!) didn’t haul in that pick-6, or why Ventrell lowered his helmet. Or, at least, see if your reasons also apply to Saban or Kirby at various points in their career when their batches of children didn’t perform as expected.

    Here’s a thought experiment: Florida State is playing very well lately. How will you feel if the Gators a) cover the spread, b) don’t cover, c) win outright? Will any of these mean Napier is a bust, and the end is near? Or he’s a great coach and the future is bright?

    Everyone needs to calm down. You should delete that subtitle. Even the recruiting landscape these days isn’t what it was 10 years ago. Yes, it isn’t great losing to Vandy. But dammit give Napier a couple years at least to develop himself, his staff, and the roster. 11 games in and invoking “the end” is ludicrous. I hope the FSU game turns things around, but crying over this bizzare outing is too much.

  2. Justin Arrendale

    Everyone was fine with year one being a roller coaster until they rode the roller coaster. This game seemed like a perfect storm of everything that can go bad, will. Poor execution, poor coaching, lack of overall talent, taking a weaker opponent for granted, poor discipline all culminated into a loss. The shots from Mullen are cheap but we all sensed that’s the sort of person he is anyways. Keep building, keep recruiting, hold the line.

  3. Mike Clemons

    No you can’t blame Mullen for any of this. You got it right in that it was a poor Bush league game plan. That’s on the coach. It was poor execution ,which is the players part but the coach is responsible through repeated practice to have them execute. And your last reason for the loss is effort. Effort is preparation, want to, desire. That’s coaching and if that player doesn’t then he replaced. It all starts with the game plan, then in game adjustments. The game plan sucked. It resembled nothing like the last 2 1/2 games and as usual zero adjustments. No this was all on Napier and his staff.

  4. Steven

    Will you write some good stuff and I often agree with you, but a few of your recent articles are reaches — this one in particular. The players made all kinds of mistakes, game losing mistakes with stupid personal foul penalties, undisciplined alignment, muffed punts, dropped passes, and so on. So you conclude that is on Napier? We are talking the same coaching staff that has guided a disciplined Gator team to the fewest penalties we have seen in many years. Napier has had this team playing uncharacteristically disciplined in several ways. All of a sudden we have an uncharacteristically bad performance as to some of these areas and it is clearly on the coaches?

    You were not at practices this week. You were not in team and position group meetings. You were not on the plane or at the team meals. You didn’t hear Napier’s talks to the team and his conversations with players during the week to prepare them. You have no idea where things went wrong leading to this disappointing performance — you just don’t have the information you need to reach such a conclusion. You are reaching a conclusion and then framing arguments to support it instead of objectively analyzing information available to you and figuring out what it supports and doesn’t support. If you were objective, you would be asking what the heck went wrong and then acknowledging that we just don’t know as fans because we don’t have enough info about our preparation during the week to know.

    Napier and his staff are always responsible in the technical sense that the coaching staffs are always responsible, the head coach in particular as Captain of the Ship. But your conclusion he and his staff didn’t have this team ready lacks support. Every coach we have ever had, including Spurrier and Meyer, had games where their teams showed up and laid an egg. Did that make those performances the fault of the coaches? Maybe. But unless we were there all week and could evaluate all the little details, we just don’t know.

    We can agree on one thing — regardless of the cause yesterday, the solution is to recruit. We are not a good enough team to win an SEC game, even Vandy, when we have a really bad outing. Teams with Bama and Georgia talent pull those games out even when they play really poorly because they are just so much better. We are not yet and the solution is to upgrade the quality of talent across our roster.

  5. john

    It was a tough game to watch with mistake after mistake. I kept waiting for the gators to wake up and take over but by the start of the 4th, I realized that wasn’t going to happen. Must win now next week but I don’t know if they can win, fsu is rolling.

  6. Don

    Great observations Will. I think Billy will be fine once he gets his guys in. Mullen was a huge disappointment. GoGators🐊🐊

  7. Jeff Clarke

    Hi Will. I’m upset because evidence suggests there have been games Napier chalked up as a definite win ahead of time. USF, Missouri, Vandy, and maybe Kentucky. And because of that he didn’t make AR run and the offense was terrible. Whereas his running was central to the game plan against Tenn, LSU, A&M, and Utah and we scored points. I’m upset with AR because he seems more intent on showing the NFL he is a pocket passer than using the tools he has to win every game. Napier should not allow that to happen. Just my opinion. Happy Thanksgiving!

    • Jeff, MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY on AR running the ball. I would give a nickel to know how many times the Gators ran the read/option yesterday because it had to be somewhere near 10 and Richardson kept the ball ZERO?? I’m no coach, but I know enough about the game to know if the DE takes you the QB you hand the ball off to the back. If he takes the back you keep the ball. Several times it looked like if Richardson had kept it, there was nobody there to tackle him. Will, you mention your YAR and Richardson rushed I think FOUR TIMES? I was really hoping u would cover the read/ option because that is so much a part of his game. FWIW he is no drop back passer. It is painfully obvious. Like Meyer in 05 trying to make Leak into a option QB. I wish him well in the NFL. Great athlete but I just don’t think he will ever read the field fast enough and his arm is like a loose cannon.

  8. Gary Keith

    Agree. Nothing more needed to be said.

  9. Al. Smith

    Great article, in my 80 years I have been to a few, I watched lue Holtz beat Steve, I was at FL field for 28 – 28 tie. With Rutgers, we have always had talent at FL. The fact is they are boys- young men, when the media tells them they are 40 points better all week it’s hard to get them ready.

  10. Mike

    Time after time after time in the first half Anthony Richardson handed the ball off when he could’ve kept it and run around the end for the long gains if not td’s . I guess he decided he had enough good things on film and wanted to make sure he didn’t “ get hit or get dirty” !As for coaching some of the worst play calling I’ve seen since he’s been here. This team is full of players who play hard when they feel like it! I don’t know if that’s just a sign of today college football players .Special teams have been poor all year long . Everything Napier is doing off the field has been excellent but I’d have to give him a F when it comes to motivating and preparing the team to play hard every week. Napiers team play on offense & defense has been wildly inconsistent week to week that’s not a good sign . I think he was thoroughly out coached on Saturday and that’s happened a number of times this year! I think he’s finding out the coaching staff’s in the Sec are far superior to the conference he came from.

  11. BCNGator

    BN’s done some good things so far, especially behind the scenes. That said, this result is really hard to explain. The odds of BN being the next Vince Lombardi were already low, and now he has a data point on his resume that no other rookie coach at UF has had.

    It wouldn’t be unprecedented – Kirby Smart did this recently himself. Many more coaches with horrible losses like this end up like Muschamp than Smart, though.

  12. Joe Friday

    Your YAR statistic is utter garbage. You don’t have a clue about football, and that nonsense stay proves it. A QB’s job is to use his head and his arm, not his legs. To count rushing yards for a QB is ludicrous. If they’re relying on their legs as a major part of their game, it’s proof they’re not a good QB. Anthony Richardson is a mediocre QB! He’s the most overrated player in college football, based on the preseason hype from fools like yourself. You fail to comprehend that the most important asset of a QB lies above the neck, not below it. Richardson can’t throw with accuracy and he’s well below being an intelligent QB. You are the classic case of having a predetermined hypothesis, that Richardson is a ln elite QB, and ignoring the ample evidence that he’s not only not elite, but far below average. An example of how ridiculous your YAR stat is when Richardson is rated a better QB than Stetson Bennett. How many games has Bennett given away? How many has Richardson?
    By the way, you and your clown partner, are really stupid about FSU. When FSU dominates Florida, maybe you’ll both open your eyes and take off your blinders. Face it, you proved your ignorance when you said FSU was “lucky” against LSU. FSU dominated LSU, if you had bothered to watch the game. Thinking that Napier is a better coach than a Orville is more proof of how stupid you are…and as Forrest Gump said: “You can’t cure stupid.”

    • Wise is the person who can disagree on content without calling someone stupid. This is the angriest post I recollect ever reading.

  13. Joe Friday

    By the way, for a stat nerd, you show your ignorance when you say Norvell in in his fourth year. He’s in his third, dummy! You recite stats like a machine, but can’t even get something as simple as how many years they’ve been at a school? It’s just more evidence of how you ignore data that doesn’t fit your perception. You actually think stats are important…which is true, but they’re not the most important thing that determines who wins or loses. Your ludicrous count of points, 41, that Florida “gave away” is about the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. You might have a clue if you get your nose out of stats and actually watch a game! Vandy win for a very simple reason! They blocked and tackled better than Florida. Vandy didn’t settle for field goals, they scored touchdowns. They screwed up too, like the dumb interception they they threw when going in for a clinching touchdown. You didn’t count that in your counting of points did you. You’re a stat nerd, and that prevents you from understanding football. You think recruiting is the answer, but it’s not. When FSU destroys Florida, how does that happen since UF has more blue chippers? Miami had many more blue chips as well…they lost 45-3! Steve Spurrier said it best: “Stats are for losers.” Maybe you should remember that the next time you pore over stats.

  14. Hope diminished.